Mon 19: The Jan Moir palaver made me dig out some reference material on same sex relationships that I had written about in an issue of Floreo NEWS. Except, annoyingly, all the links have gone.
The gist of that scientific research (which I can´t remember much about now) was that species become same sex (as opposed to having a preference for homo-sexual relations) prior to dying out… as a species.
The internet has a different view, opining that same sex is either for population control or because war brings out excess testosterone or for kin selection. The general agreement seemed to be that the human species can switch its sexual circuits, ie we are capable of bisexuality, rather than having a preference for one sex, for sex, all the time - if you see what I mean.
Well they´d die out if that was the case … unless science stepped in. And guess what?
In my current spiritual incarnation, I do believe in legal partnerships to protect relationships, but am religiously old-fashioned and think `marriage´ is one between a man and woman, ideally for procreation - also the old-fashioned way. Survival of this species, for what it´s worth.
While fascinated by life created in a test tube, I do wonder what strange sentients are being generated in labs around the world, hence having a preference for the old-fashioned way although nurture and nature can and does still create its Hitlers.
That said, in my spiritual opinion, the human species is undergoing serious change, which our grandchildren will probably be witness to. I just hope I am not around as human automatons are annoying enough without emotionless robots and other kinds of chimera taking over the world.
Meanwhile, someone tweeted a link to an article by Lionel Shriver which made me laugh. Grim laughter really. It´s a novel "all about the emotional complexities of inheritance".
Shriver adds: "My younger brother, … stopped speaking to me for two years, although - more’s the pity - that didn’t stop him from firing off a series of outraged letters, just as my parents did. Since this was before any of us was online (and I shudder to contemplate the flurry of scathing, five-times-a-day tit-for-tat had we been writing emails instead), for weeks I received indignant screeds in the post that ran to six or seven pages - single-spaced."
I have indeed had emails about my `stupid blog´ and a few have tested me rather deeply. Yet I only write some of the things said to me, and my reaction. Indeed this blog is predominantly for my reactions, and presumably my failings on my spiritual journey. Although it could just as well be about the challenges created by others in my closer and distant worlds.
Life coaches would say we attract them to us. Possibly. The more I think of that chestnut though I feel these are challenges we allow (rather than attract) from habit or guilt or misplaced loyalties. The latter is often the case with those who support political parties from cradle to grave or stay in one faith without question or any spiritual evolution.
Families and friendships need to evolve or they die. Habits of disrespect have to change or the relationship eventually fails - unless one is a masochist.
Shriver does add - as indeed I have, on countless occasions - that all views are purely subjective. This is how I perceive things. I do try to be scrupulous with the truth though, even subjectively, so I try to write in a much milder form than what is actually internalising within me.
If poor communication or what I see as bad behaviour upset me, I honestly try to mention it without describing how I really feel: the anger, the hurt, fighting negative desires for retribution and so on.
And I accept that my humour or actions also have similar effects. A joke (in my mind) about music caused offence, it seems. Yet if I really wanted to be offensive about a situation or a person, it would be very easy to let rip.
The difference, to me, is the continuous drip of negativity. Endlessly repeated untruths or misunderstandings eventually kill love and affection. Repeat something often enough and even reasonable people will believe it is true.
Dad always used to say I was the honest one; `too sincere´ was another thing he said about me. In fact, I recall him telling me more than once that sometimes lying could be a good move.
I may not tell everyone everything, but I can assure all my readers, if I have done or said something amiss, I would admit to it if asked. So if I say something is NOT true, it is NOT TRUE.
Being single has many benefits. On the down side, if there are issues with any NandDs, all of whom are more than capable of sticking up for themselves, they get their male folk to harass me as well. I am staggered they cannot see how that is a kind of bullying.
In the corner image is the one which a NandD thought was of me crying. The other is the next one that Dad took, seconds later. More like fed up, than crying or upset. Why do people get things so wrong? And I include the rude remarks made about me at the recent wedding. And repeated TOO MUCH ever since.
Euphrosene Labon Mind Body Spirit Artist Author Writer
Euphrosene´s Gallery of Contemporary Spiritual Art & Cartoons